http://www.digitaltoast.co.uk/channel-4-censured-global-warming-swindle ...and another thing! Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:02:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://www.digitaltoast.co.uk/channel-4-censured-global-warming-swindle/comment-page-1#comment-173408 sex toys Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:22:20 +0000 http://www.digitaltoast.co.uk/?p=368#comment-173408 thanks! thanks!

]]> http://www.digitaltoast.co.uk/channel-4-censured-global-warming-swindle/comment-page-1#comment-167908 Rob Fisher Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:06:24 +0000 http://www.digitaltoast.co.uk/?p=368#comment-167908 It was hardly an arse whupping. The only criticisms were "you should have given more notice to respond". Ofcom didn't rule on the whether or not anything they said was factual. For a sober analysis, see <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3335" rel="nofollow">here for the IPCC complaint</a>, <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3334" rel="nofollow">here for Wunsch</a>, <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3329" rel="nofollow">here for King</a> and <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3328" rel="nofollow">here for some other bunch</a>. Most of the complaints were dismissed. It was hardly an arse whupping. The only criticisms were “you should have given more notice to respond”. Ofcom didn’t rule on the whether or not anything they said was factual. For a sober analysis, see here for the IPCC complaint, here for Wunsch, here for King and here for some other bunch. Most of the complaints were dismissed.

]]>