Enviro-home energy saving claims.

September 7, 2006 11:13 pm

I nipped down to Reading to see, amongst other things, the Enviro Home at the St James Kennet Island development.

I noticed a couple of inconsistencies and figures I didn’t recognise. This isn’t in any way meant to badmouth or sound skeptical about solar and environmental stuff, I’m all for it. The trouble is that when random and artificially high figures are bandied about, and then rubbished by BBC’s Rogue Traders special on Solar Salesmen, it’s not really going to help the industry.

Anyway, I’m going to be lazy and let people make some comments, then I’ll come back in a couple of days and integrate the facts and figures.

As you walk into the house, you are greeted by this:

List of claims

Ignoring the wayward apostrophe for a moment, inside the house, it’s…

Solar PV 30 to 40 percent

This sounds a bit high for PV. Unless they plan on using 1 lightblub. I mean, bulb.

And now we’re up to 40 percent!

Solar PV 40 percent

Now, what about that hot water?

It provides 13% of the hot water…

13% hot water tiles

but provides a 25% gas saving. Not sure I can reconcile those figures. Anyone?

Solar hot water 25 percent

Then there’s the spelling, grammar and punctuation.

Light Blubs
Bad spelling

Links: Solar Century

3 Responses to “Enviro-home energy saving claims.”

Skipweasel wrote a comment on September 8, 2006

Hang on, you can’t add up percentages like that.

Example.

I save 50% of my electricity bill and 50% of my gas bill. Wow, I’ve saved 100% - so why do I keep getting bills?

As for the spelling, typography and punctuation, dire, isn’t it. The worst place I know for that is the Secret Hills Centre in Craven Arms - I was fuming when I left the place. Expensive, shallow and full of errors.

Biff wrote a comment on September 8, 2006

I wouldn’t buy more than greengroceries
From a man who’s too free with apostrophies.

Miauca wrote a comment on October 28, 2007

So, does it mean that these homes are not as fab as they are billed as being? Or that someone is publicising them incorrectly. I’d love to know just how much energy they are saving, as opposed to how much energy they say they are saving.
Obviously all steps in the right direction are great but it seems a shame if they are making crazy claims - just telling it like it is would do.

Care to comment?

If your comment does not appear, please

contact me

digitaltoast is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!