Gemstone Bay, New Zealand

Click for more New Zealand photos

Lake Matheson, New Zealand

Click for more New Zealand photos

Skipper's Canyon Jetboat, New Zealand

Click for more New Zealand photos

Flags flying over the Ville Close

Concarneau, France

Swan taking off

Newtown, Wales

Street performer,Vienna

Click for more photos of Bratislava and Vienna

Model and real cranes

Nantes, France

Snow, Wales

Click for more pics from Wales

What's Happening

  • You need the RS Event plugin for this section.
  • Or use the Sidebar Widget plugin to change the content.

Posts Tagged ‘political correctness’

Hazel Blears and The Fabian Society on Political Correctness

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

I never thought I’d say this about any Labour government minister, ever, but … three cheers for Hazel Blears!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7909258.stm

People must be more willing to challenge ideas that conflict with core British values, the communities secretary has said.

Hazel Blears said there was too much “squeamishness” about condemning unacceptable practices, like forced marriages, for fear of causing offence.

Debate about the role of religion was “being sapped by a creeping over-sensitivity”, she argued in a speech.

I mean, OK, it’s what most of the rest of society has been saying for years, but for a government minister to recognise it is impressive.  (Do I feel an election coming on?) It’s also covered by The Telegraph and The Guardian(who manage to give it a negative spin for some bizarre reason)

Here’s the odd thing – I heard this being discussed on 5 Live between 9am and 10am on 25/02/09 (clear to hear the show) and they had some pillock from The Fabian Society basically saying that it was a silly thing for her to say, and he went on to say “Who is saying what can and can’t be said”?

Er….what short memories The Left have! It was them who said that one shouldn’t say “chav” because it’s politically incorrect!


Activities Abroad offers chav-free holidays.

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

Good on Alistair McLean from  Activities Abroad for offering Chav Free holidays! Here’s a section of the email which was sent to users:

 

Hello [ ----- ]

Chav Free Activity Holidays

According to the Daily Mail, children with middle-class names such as Duncan and Catherine are eight times more likely to pass their GCSE’s than children with names such as Wayne and Dwayne.

This got us to thinking. Are there names you are likely to encounter or not encounter on an Activities Abroad holiday? After a bit of research we came up with two lists of names.

Unlikely

Likely

Britney

John

Kylie-Lianne

Sarah

Bianca 

James

Tiffany

Charles

Dazza

Rachel

Chardonnay

Michael

Chantelle

Alice

Candice

Lucy

Courtney

Joseph

Shannon

Charlotte

Nuff said, innit?

Brilliant! Very witty and refreshingly honest change from the usual grey corporate email.

Then the Daily Mail reported that the firm was under fire. You read more from the BBC and hear an interview with Alistair Mclean on Five Live.

Turns out this woman has had a total sense-of-humour and humanity failure. Here’s the reply from Alistair McLean in the blog

 

Firstly, I am delighted that you enjoyed your “perfect holiday” with Activities Abroad.

I’d also like to say that I am genuinely sorry if our newsletter caused offence for it was I who authorised the mailing. However, I simply feel it is time the middle classes stood up for themselves.

We work hard to make a decent home and life for our families and we pay our taxes to contribute to our society and economy. Unfortunately, everybody else in our society seems to take from us whether it is incompetent bankers or the shell suited urchins who haunt our street corners.

Last year Activities Abroad paid: corporation tax, income tax, PAYE, national insurance contributions, VAT and contributed to Aids projects in South Africa and other charitable organisations. We make a positive contribution to our economy and watch it all be frittered away by people who simply can’t be bothered (”bovvered”).

So regardless of whether it is class warfare or not I make no apology for proclaiming myself to be middle class and a genuine contributor to our society.

We sent the newsletter to 24,000 people and only 11 (0.0458%) have expressed themselves to be unhappy with the content. The rest presumably took it in the toungue and cheek manner in which it was intended.

Did you write to the BBC when they featured Vicky Pollard on Little Britain or Catherine Tait’s Lauren Cooper? Do you encourage your children to go off and play with with the shell suited, Lambert and Butler sucking teenagers who hang around our shopping centres at night?

Again, my apologies if we offended and I am genuinely sorry that you won’t be traveling with us or recommending us in the future.

Regards

Alistair McLean

Yes, the word chav is now politically incorrect. But the fightback has begun – the Daily Mail and Daily Express both carry opinion pieces, but let’s not pretend this is a tabloid-only issue.

The fightback of the working majority starts today. Enough is enough – if we don’t stand up for people like Alistair, then we might as well give up and join the abhorrent views of The Fabian Society – talking of which, here’s Jon Holmes giving his opinion of them!

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Optional reading matter:

 

Shame on the Netherlands

Monday, January 26th, 2009

It’s not just the UK government which have no morals left.

The Dutch courts want to prosecute Geert Wilders for his film, Fitna.

Here’s Pat Condell discussing it 

YouTube Preview Image

Any Answers Irish Setter stupid racism caller

Sunday, January 18th, 2009

There’s a great show on BBC Radio 4 called Any Answers. (You can listen again on that page).

It makes often hilarious or frustrating listening as the Great British Public expose their general ignorance and prejudices, but can also be educational and cathartic in a “glad it’s not just me thinking that” kind of way.

Every now and then, you get what is clearly a wind-up. And so, at first, I thought this next caller was.

On Any Questions the night before, in a special episode from America regarding the Obama inauguration, a questioner asked “What dog do you hope the Obamas have in the Whitehouse?”
It was one of those light-hearted end-of-show questions, to which Christopher Hitchens answered “Irish Setter – stupid, highly strung, but dead loyal”. Here’s a clip of the question:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

And of course, no-one thought about it much more. Until Any Answers. At first, I thought “Rosheen from Islington, London” was a wind-up. She said it was “racist of the BBC to broadcast the word ‘Irish’ in the same sentence as the word ’stupid’” Apparently, she’d phoned up the night before to ask the BBC to edit the comment, and how highly offensive she found it – blah-de-blah, whatever, love. But then, she said it was “re-inforcing the stereotype that Irish people are stupid”. Now THAT is irony! I thought that any minute now, she’ll crack, or laugh and hang up. And slowly, scarily, it dawned – this woman (in her own slightly damaged mind) was genuine! You couldn’t make this stuff up, have a listen:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Maximum respect to Jonathan Dimbleby, he just managed to keep his cool. Of course, now we’re in the territory where you don’t know whether someone is being serious, winding people up, or just a bit nuts. Check out this BBC Message board if you don’t believe me, for a classic example of hand-wringing twattage from user “nibhrionn”


I listened to both programmes and agree totally with Madeline’s point. Hitchen’s knew that he had said something that was potentially offensive but Dimbleby caused real offense by his rude dismissal of the caller. Casual racism is still endemic in this country as evidenced by the recent revelations about the royal family but I guess objecting to this is “political correctness gone mad” as well.

Update: Looks like I wasn’t the only one to blog about this. Alan Brookland has a bit more of a transcript and some thoughts on this, and there’s chatter about it on the Glasgow West End forum. However, in the kind of comment that makes me dispair for humanity, HitchensWatch has embarrased itself with a post which leaves one feeling that if it’s not a joke, it was written by a humanities graduate with a sense-of-everything failure.

Here’s an extract from HitchensWatch- and remember, we’re talking about a breed of dog here:

He decided instead to tell an Irish joke, and not just any old Irish joke, but the kind that relies for its effect on the listeners’ understanding that the Irish, as a race, are intellectually challenged and over-sensitive.

This incidence of schoolboy racist humor was picked up by Jack Grantham, who put together the YouTube clip above with some very familiar images and brought the offense to our attention. I must say it amazes me that the BBC can allow this sort of thing to pass with giggles of approval and no apologies by anyone involved, while at the same time they can’t even bring themselves to carry an appeal for humanitarian aid for the Palestinian refugees in Gaza. More than this, the entire episode seems to have been scripted rather than spontaneous, as is often the case with radio broadcasts. If this is the case, it means that the scriptwriter, director, presenter, questioner and associated staff, as well as the Drink-Soaked One himself, were all perfectly happy to make a lame racist joke for the express purpose of rounding off a light-hearted radio show. What next for Hitch and the Beeb, one wonders? Jokes about cotton fields? Concentration camps? Dwellers of the jungles or deserts? Aids sufferers? The malnourished and starving? The visually, physically, mentally and chromosomally handicapped? People with slitty eyes? Or are the Irish now to be singled out for special treatment?

Nuts. I have no doubt this moron would confuse race and religion when it comes to Islam, too. And not the only example of political correctness gone mad, recently…

Just to recap:

Irish Setter

Irish Setter

Irish Nutter

Irish Nutter

Update! I don’t believe it – there’s a youtube video now! This is nuts, not least because the maker can’t even spell “racist”!

YouTube Preview Image

Harry, Paki, Prince Edward, the RSPCA and a Labrador

Sunday, January 11th, 2009

Update: At last, a bit of sense on the subject:

It is all so very typical of modern Britain, or at least a section of the modern British media and its absence of any sense of perspective. There’s a dislike of anything which smacks of complexity and a refusal to understand that people make mistakes.

And heavens, one can never imagine a News of the World reader using such a term as that employed by the Prince. Pass the sick-bag, please.

See also the BBC PM blog although other parts of the BBC can’t seem to avoid the hysteria – have a listen to the clip on this page

So, here’s the big front page news story in the UK. What could it be? Peace in the middle east? The economy? A breakthrough in the fight against cancer? No, it’s this:

Prince Harry has apologised for using offensive language to describe a Pakistani member of his army platoon.

The News of the World has published a video diary in which the prince calls one of his then Sandhurst colleagues a “Paki” in his commentary.

St James’s Palace said he had used the term three years ago as a nickname about a friend and without any malice.

It gets worse – there’s a video on that page; it warns “Guidance – this video contains strong language”.
Oooh, what could it be? The F word? Or perhaps the C word? No, it’s the word “paki”. 

But tellingly, the bloke involved didn’t even mind, and his friends say

“He wasn’t offended – he may even have invented this nickname for himself” 

The BBC Have Your Say page sums the actual mood of the nation up nicely:

Now I’m no huge Royalist, but FFS, this non-story today and more whipped-up hysteria about a man not hitting a dog a few weeks back really makes me wonder if Big Brother isn’t enough of an opiate for the masses this time round:

The RSPCA has been investigating claims the The Earl of Wessex, Prince Edward, may have struck a Labrador with a walking stick on the Queen’s Sandringham estate in Norfolk.

But it now says there is not enough evidence to support the allegation.

The investigation followed public complaints when pictures showing the prince holding a stick over a black Labrador were published in December.

Buckingham Palace said the prince had waved his stick to break up a fight between his two dogs over a dead pheasant.

In a statement, the animal charity said: “The RSPCA has closed its investigation as there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation that Prince Edward beat his dog.”

But it’s not just the press – a group called Republic are masturbating themselves into a frenzy

“Harry’s comments are a disgrace and may seriously harm our armed forces. 

“Harry Wales has not only demonstrated how he is unfit to be a possible future Head of State, he has shown he isn’t even fit to be a leader of men and women in the armed forces.”

Now, has anyone got any REAL news?

Links: http://princeharryapology.blogspot.com/

More twattage: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7826701.stm

Great White Hopes – Professor David Gillborn on race on Radio 4

Monday, January 5th, 2009

The BBC recently ran a couple of programmes on Radio 4 called
Great White Hopes

Henry Bonsu investigates current debates about class and poverty in education policy, in the light of calls by Trevor Phillips, head of the Commission for Equalities and Human Rights, for Britain’s white working class children to receive special educational funding, alongside other underachieving minorities.

Wow – actually seems like a good idea. Unless your name is Professor David Gilbourne Gillborn (see footnote below) in which case you manage to undo the last 15 years of progress with the most ill-judged comment I’ve heard for a long while. Listen and weep!

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

So, who is this Professor David Gillborn?

My work includes ethnographic research on racism in schools and classrooms; conceptual writing on the nature of racism in educational policy and practice; mixed-method evidence reviews; and analyses of policy initiatives at local, national and international levels

If you’re still awake and want to know more, his book Racism and Education: Coincidence or Conspiracy? is available second hand from Amazon marked with a “low price” of £499. I’ll take two….(cheaper copies do seem available)

Now for a correction: I was contacted on 31/March/2009 by a representative of academic publisher Taylor and Francis. I am always happy to quickly correct any mistakes, and it appears I made quite a big one confusing Gillborn and Gilbourne, who had both written on race in education.

We would like to draw your attention to your article “Great White Hopes – Professor David Gilbourne on race on Radio 4”.
http://www.digitaltoast.co.uk/great-white-hopes-david-gilbourneThe article uses a radio interview with Professor David Gillborn (note the correct spelling of Professor Gillborn’s name) of the Institute of Education, London, and then links to a lecture by Professor David Gilbourne of UWIC, Cardiff. You seem to suggest that the radio interview and the lecture are by the same person. David Gillborn of the Institute of Education, London’s research concerns race and racism in education. David Gilbourne of Cardiff Metropolitan University’s research examines qualitative research in sport and exercise. As far as we are aware, the two are not connected. Please would you amend the text of
http://www.digitaltoast.co.uk/great-white-hopes-david-gilbourne accordingly.

Thank you to that person for bringing this to my attention – as they contacted me through the private form, I haven’t used their name, but they can use the comment field below if they’d like to add anything.

Council bans brainstorming

Friday, July 18th, 2008

From The Telegraph (and many others)

Meaningless jargon and trendy buzzwords should be banned from town halls, it was claimed, after one council introduced the term “thought showers” to replace “brainstorming”.

Tunbridge Wells Borough Council in Kent ordered the change because they feared epilepsy sufferers may be offended by the term used to describe idea-generating sessions.

But charities representing epileptics said the ban was taking political correctness too far.

Once again, The Now Show have it nicely covered:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

The word “chav” is now politically incorrect.

Thursday, July 17th, 2008

You are really, really not going to believe this – here are a few brown pearls of wisdom from Tom Hampson of the Fabian Society (the people that brought you political correctness).

UPDATE: Jon Holmes covered this on The Now Show on BBC Radio 4 on 1st Aug 2008 – here’s the mp3

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

‘Chav’ is way above the threshold of acceptability. It is deeply offensive

In whose opinion?

to a largely voiceless group

HA! Voiceless?! If only! You really haven’t left your Islington flat in a while, have you?

and – especially when used in normal middle-class conversation or on national TV – it betrays a deep and revealing level of class hatred.

I’ll come back to this. Keep going before the coke hits….

The phenomenon of the word has grown over the last five years. Initially it was purely a term of abuse. (You only have to visit the website chavscum.com to see this – have a look at it and be appalled.)

Er, knock knock? Not noticed that it became chavtowns.co.uk a while back? Never mind, doesn’t seem you’re on the same planet anyway

You cannot consider yourself of the left and use the word.

Although I don’t consider myself on the left anyway, how patronising can you get? So, left = mental and unable to have an opinion?! I know several “people of the left” – their opinion is wrong, of course, but I haven’t even for one moment considered such nonsense as that last sentence.

It is sneering and patronising

A little like your article, Tom?

and – perhaps most dangerous – it is distancing, turning the ‘chav’ into the kind of feral beast that exists only in tabloid headlines.

There is nothing I would like more than distance from chavs, and nothing would please me more if they really DID exist only in tabloid headlines, but if I can just get you to pop your copy of Socialist Worker down and look in the real world for a moment, you’ll find they are very much feral, and very much out there.

But who does the white working class have?

WORKING class? If ignorance is bliss, you must be a very happy man, Tom. Chavs are not “working class”. You seem to think they are somehow forced into their position. You don’t have Burberry, prison-white trainers and a Renault Clio Turbo forced on you. You aspire to it. Chavs relish, embrace and cultivate the way they are.

You might think they would at least have the progressive left, but it would seem not.

Since when did “progressive” equate to “ignorant”?

The BBC should specify the word in its guidelines for programme makers and take class discrimination seriously. The new Commission for Equality and Human Rights should show that they understand class discrimination is an issue that can have effects as detrimental as racial or gender bias.

I’m really beginning to wonder if my clock is set wrong and it’s actually April Fool’s Day.

But more importantly, we must stop using it ourselves. From now on – embarrassingly PC though it may seem – I shall audibly ‘tut tut’ and wince whenever I hear it used. You should too.

Should I? Well, thanks for giving us the benefit of Comrade Hampson’s wisdom.

If you need an antidote by now, I suggest The Campaign Against Political Correctness.

If Tom is reading this, here’s something to keep him happy:

YouTube Preview Image

David Thompson has also blogged about this. Guardian Article. BBC article.

digitaltoast is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache